SolidSnake wrote on 27
th May, 2014 at 4:46pm:
Well, I've noticed that their filters are working fine.. out of 4000+ impressions only 24 did count including mine...
OK, that's just wrong. I think what they need to do is adopt something that worked very well at a banner site I once belonged to. Get the site average of clicks to impressions ratio and then reward people where they stand according to that ratio. If the average is 1 in 50 then anybody above that gets a higher share of the revenue. Anybody below gets lower. This both gives incentives for people to improve their banner rankings and slowly raises the banner average, but it also does not punish some publishers because of the perceived quality of their hits(the bottom line is click throughs of course).
Do they think those 4000 impressions of yours were got free?