ruicarlov wrote on 15
th Nov, 2014 at 11:11pm:
To escape from the cold and rain. There's nothing like going to a warmer place in our winter to take a break from bad weather.
Anyway, my major focus is the Bahamas, not Miami itself, where I only spend a day and a half, give or take.
But I still don't understand this:
"2.a. Then you can pay $2 for the vacation mode which in other words would mean a loss of 6100 - 2100 = 4000 BAPs."
Why do you subtract the daily tax cost from the cost of vacation mode? They're both costs, so they should be added. It's unlike option 2, where the 4200 is a gain and the 2100 is a cost, and therefore you subtract one from the other.
The 2100 in the line you quote is not the daily tax.. but the profit from clicking daily for 21 days minus the tax, so it's actually a bonus.
6100 comes from the cost of $2 for the vacation mode.
However since 2.a follows from option 2 where you will be ending up with a profit of 2100 BAPs (since you haven't stopped clicking like in option 1) I think it should be included in the comparison "1 vs 2" because it minimizes the damage of the vacation filter.
Considering that you stay in the same level throughout the 21 days the initial theoretical balance of 100000 BAPs will become 102100 BAPs at the day you purchase the filter. On the other hand if you stop clicking the BAP ads for 21 days that same initial balance will have been reduced to 97900 because of the taxes at the day your vacation starts.
Either way another mportant factor is how many days you will be away and how many ads you would be served during those days to see if both ways are actually worth it..
Plus there's this thing... could you really resist NOT to click on those lovely BAP ads for 3 FULL WEEKS?!?
I think the temptation would be rather strong for me...