Ah yes, the rice site. I remember using it some time ago, but I kinda forgot about it.

1,000,000+ BAPS!

And because my earnings are continually reinvested, the value of my 1% ads are now $1.16. So that's an extra dollar boost to my earnings every day. That bonus sure does help to compound the earnings

moneymarketing wrote on 17^th Oct, 2014 at 6:32pm:

You're talking about the $9 worth of the cheap traffic right?

Nice to see we're slowly conquering Paidverts! 

Btw, I've just created a new 125x125 banner..
I got the idea from the member's page within the site.. 



What do you think?

moneymarketing wrote on 18^th Oct, 2014 at 2:12pm:


this is done

Am I correct in thinking that it might be more cost effective in buying multiple ad packs at once this way the baps points lasts longer as you also click along the way and all? Thanks!

dansbanners wrote on 20^th Oct, 2014 at 9:26pm:


I don't think it would be cost effective, especially if you are buying from outside the site (like paypal) because you have transaction fees. So buy buying in bulk, you lose less in upfront costs

From a convenience point of view, it is better to buy the biggest ad pack going, that way, when you get your 1% ads you get bigger clicks. If you buy a $10 ad verses 10 $1 ads, you get 1 ten cent ad to click for 10 days instead of ten one cent ads each day. So you will be saving time from that perspective

Your BAPs also won't last longer per se, they will just be distributed in a different way. You are still going to get the same value of clicks for the BAPs bought. You are also getting BAP taxed every day that you have BAPs in circulation so, if you aren't constantly buying more ads or clicking on your daily BAP activation ads, you will lose more if you have your BAPs over the longer term

dansbanners wrote on 20^th Oct, 2014 at 9:26pm:

When purchasing ads with PayPal, just like MM says it does matter.. the fees are 7.5% on the total amount +$0.30 per transaction.
So, neither large transactions are good, nor many transactions.. A good example for that is that to get 9 standard ad packs you pay $9.98. So it's almost 10% lost in fees. Pushing it up to 92 standard packs the cost would be $99.2 which means it's ~8% or ~$8 lost in fees.

On the other hand when using our PV balance there are no fees at all so then the only thing that matters is the level.
As far as I know everyone on the same level receives almost the same value of paid ads (provided there are enough ads for all of them)

I think even a small reinvestment is important if it grants one a level up to a higher group, because the next day he will receive that group's amount of ads which can be relatively higher. On the other hand even a large investment is not so important if it doesn't get the member in the next level as he probably won't see any difference in the daily ads he will receive.

From an advertiser's point of view larger packs are most welcome because this way he will get more unique visitors. Setting up a lot of smaller ads means that the same members will get a chance to click them all which means less unique clicks in the end. Also, a lot of ad campaigns tend to pile up and makes it a bit harder to keep track.

moneymarketing wrote on 21^st Oct, 2014 at 8:39am:

Well, the referral list in MTV is the same with paidverts.. they are merged sites and if one creates an account for one of the two, his account stands for both of them (the same goes for the referrals). For me, the balance amount is the same to my PV balance.. Isn't that the same for you as well?