ruicarlov wrote on 31^st Oct, 2013 at 7:26pm:


It is not an exact science but with bigger numbers they begin to average out. At some point you'll get people who click every day and some who only click to stay active while others don't click at all. As long as the group is carrying itself, then I can't worry about it

I agree about the tracking. It is better than it used to be since before he had none  I just go with the sites that get referrals in general. At least they let us know that. Since everything I am spending in advertising is coming out of advertising profits, I count it all as a net compound gain. MFS along with some others are 'turning a profit' for me right now so I am reinvesting in the whole comprehensively, tracking where I can and not worrying about the details for those I can't. If some sites get a little charity
advertising along the way, then, so be it. Things are a lot better than they used to be when no one had any tracking

Awesome update:

401 first level referrals
603 referrals total (6.9% of all site affiliates)
19.06 shares in commissions daily 
Average per affiliate now at .031

moneymarketing wrote on 16^th Nov, 2013 at 9:54pm:


This is wrong. I finally figured out how they calculate this. The commission share number is  total shares earned in commissions. So, in reality, I'm only earning about 2 shares per day, not the 19 that is shown above.

The other numbers are correct, and it looks like I'll need another 3600 referrals before I am in a net share 'profit' 

I decided to go ahead and try out the silver membership for one month. Let's see how many referrals it brings me.

For my team(which is pretty much everyone on here):

I animated the white MFS banner and it does approximately twice as well when it comes to clicks. Sign ups are a bit more difficult to measure since i have the banner in so many places and a lot of referrals already(it is difficult to keep track of the new links that get added to the list. I wish he would add a sort feature or something) but the sign ups seem to be increasing at the same pace as the clicks. You guys are welcome to use it. I'll even host it for you. Here is the link:

http://waterforlife.ws/mfs1.gif

This just goes to show how much more effective simply animating a banner is. That always blows my mind. Catching the viewer's eye is job one.

Hey SS, maybe you might want to think about that regarding your text ads on your ad page. Nothing too fancy, just a slow blink ( and that.... of course.... would be..... wait for it....... MORE WORK!  I do that to you every time!  )

ruicarlov wrote on 2^nd Dec, 2013 at 6:12pm:


Yes, the RRs have really dropped off since the changeover. I think a lot more people are getting the upgrade for the RRs and thus diluting the benefit. Apologies if I made it out to sound better than it was

moneymarketing wrote on 1^st Dec, 2013 at 1:25am:

Btw, if you would like me to, I could switch your banner on the Ads page to this one.. (Make sure you have unlimited bandwidth..)
As for the text links it would be really bad for the looks.. the point with blinking is that it is effective as long as it happens
at small amounts.. consider how you would feel if you visit a page where everything is blinking.. lol
Sometime a nice looking colorful design is even better than blinking.. check this out.. it's the clicks from the last week on the Ads page :


Notice how the 7clix banner attracts the clicks..

Btw, I could make an attempt to create you a fresh banner if I get some time since I also need one..
I'll get back to you on that.