ruicarlov wrote on 26
th Feb, 2013 at 9:49pm:
I'd been wondering if it was really sustainable on a long term to only have ads paying +$0.005, like in PTCbox. Looks like the answer was no, or at least harder to do it.
Well, I never liked tiny-nano-pico ads.. or whatever they're called. I wouldn't pay to get people just visit my site for 5 seconds
except if I was interested only in raising my traffic ranks.. but I would pay for at least 15 second ad visitor to check my site
instead of just waiting for the timer to expire. I think 30 or 60 seconds are a much better deal and CashClixs has an amazing
security system that does not allow the visitor to lose focus of the window at all. So the more time you force him to stay on
your site the better chances you have to make him check it out deeper and get interested in it. However some advertisers are
only attracted by big numbers on cheap prices so this move could attract them here.
(Big parenthesis..)
But IMHO, flooding the ads page with ads that pay $0.001 like neobux and other "bux" sites is discouraging for the clicker..
Neobux did this and here's how it ended up.. I wonder how many people click ads there other than the required ones to get
credit by their refs.. That's why their average has dropped so much. PTCBox admin was just trying to make our minds realize
what neobux did to succeed.. of course it was sustainable for the site, and definitely profitable for Fernando but what about
actual members(active clickers)? I don't agree with the way PTCBox admin treated us after the PayPal event.. but I cannot
disagree with the way he was thinking all that time before then.. It was about time someone made some serious effort to raise
some respect for PTC sites. Instead of creating a clone he tried to innovate. Yep, it all failed in the end but at least he tried..
We need new ideas to improve PTCs otherwise the majority of people will never take them seriously..